Changing Farmland Tenure and Food Sovereignty on the Canadian Prairies

Photo credit: Katherine Aske

Researchers: Annette Desmarais, André Magnan, Mengistu Wendimu, Naomi Beingessner, Hannah Bihun, Melissa Davidson, Katherine Aske, Laura Funk, Darrin Qualman, and Nettie Wiebe

There is growing evidence that investors are acquiring large tracts of farmland around the world.

Critics refer to this phenomenon as 'land grabbing', a process by which elites gain control of farmland at the expense of local communities and farmers. Investors' entry into farmland ownership has the potential to change social and economic relations, and may have broader implications for rural development, environmental conditions, and the viability of family farming. Yet, little research has been done on changing patterns of farmland ownership, concentration, and land tenure in Canada from the ground level; there is also little research on agricultural landlords in Canada and  alternative models of land tenure. These issues are at the heart of this research project on changing farmland tenure and food sovereignty in the Canadian prairies where 71.6% of Canada's total agricultural land is located. 

We gratefully acknowledge that this research was made possible with an Insight Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada.

The specific objectives of this research have been to:

1/ Document changes in farmland ownership patterns in the Canadian prairie region from 2006-2016;

2/ Analyze the social impact and environmental implications of changing farmland ownership; and

3/ Examine the social and policy responses to changes in farmland ownership, including models of land tenure that could contribute to food sovereignty on the Canadian prairies.

Publications associated with this research are listed below. Stay tuned for future publications.

Published peer-reviewed articles

  • Naomi Beingessner, André Magnan, & Mengistu Wendimu, 2023, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.

    Read the full article here.

    This article examines contemporary political controversies over agricultural land in the prairie region of Canada. We suggest that contemporary land politics reflect elements of continuity and change in a distinctive “land imaginary” connected to the region’s history and recent restructuring. While neoliberalism, and more recently, financialization, have been the main drivers of restructuring in recent decades, certain strands of agrarianism continue to shape social relations in the agricultural sector. We present three case studies, the first of which examines the controversy over institutional investment in farmland, focusing on the Canada Pension Plan’s large-scale purchase of Saskatchewan land. The second case study examines conflicts over the deregulation of government-run community pastures, with implications for the ranching sector, environmental conservation, and the future of native prairie. Our third case study focuses on the proposed sale and land-use conversion of government-owned pasture land in Alberta, dubbed “Potatogate”. We examine the role of farmers, ranchers, governments, NGOs, and private interests in shaping debates over land ownership and use. We argue that these conflicts reveal a tension between (financial) neoliberalism and agrarian arguments and values, with significant differences across agricultural sub-sectors.

  • André Magnan, Melissa Davidson & Annette Aurélie Desmarais, 2022, Agriculture and Human Values.

    Read the full article here.

    Unequal access to land, driven by decades of consolidation and concentration, is of increasing concern around the globe. This article analyzes growing farm consolidation and land concentration in the province of Saskatchewan, considered Canada’s agricultural powerhouse. Drawing on Land Titles data and Census of Agriculture statistics, we document trends associated with a changing farm structure such as increasingly large land holdings, growing ownership concentration, and the emergence of a class of mega-farms. The largest farms, many of which have roots in family enterprise, are becoming increasingly complex in their organizational form and in their relationships to farmland, rented and owned. Our qualitative analysis allows us to provide an ‘on the ground’ view of these trends, including the multiple social and environmental changes wrought by on-going consolidation. We argue that these trends are contributing to a homogenization, flattening, and emptying out of Saskatchewan rural landscapes. Furthermore, we document increasing competitive pressures and land market dynamics that will likely continue to exacerbate land inequality and impede the entry of new farmers. Our research underlines the importance of new, more sophisticated ways of conceptualizing the family farm and its evolution from ‘farm to firm’.

  • André Magnan, Mengistu Wendimu, Annette Aurélie Desmarais and Katherine Aske, 2022, Canadian Food Studies.

    Read the full article here.

    This research builds on the emerging body of literature investigating the implications of changing land tenure relations in the Prairie Provinces, where over 70% of Canada’s farmland is located. Through an analysis of survey data collected in 2019 from 400 grain farmers, we address the following research questions: How are farmers experiencing changing patterns of land tenure and control at the local level? What challenges and opportunities do farmers face in these changing farmland markets? And, how has the entry of new actors (farmland investors) changed relationships between landlords and tenants? Our findings suggest that those farmers who are witnessing the financialization of farmland in their regions view this phenomenon with alarm. Furthermore, we show that those who rent from corporate investors are more often subject to landlord influence over production practices and pay higher rental rates than those who rent from other landlord types. Concern about farmland concentration is widespread among Prairie farmers, with a variety of negative effects identified, including increased competition over land and the decline of local communities. We recommend that future research probe how different investor types (individual vs. corporate and/or institutional) engage in land markets, examine the gender dimensions of landlord-tenant relations, and engage in analyses that challenge the current iteration of the private property regime.

  • Naomi Beingessner, 2021, Geoforum

    Read the full article here.

    Global conflicts over land grabbing, financialization, and conservation have generated resistance from diverse local peoples who insist that land must be more than a commodity; it has social, cultural, and ecological value alongside its economic productivity. Saskatchewan’s government has recently responded to similar conflicts over investment, privatization, and concentration of landholding, by engaging in public consultations on farmland ownership. Analyzing comments from public consultation surveys in 2015 and 2017, the paper employs insights from property theory, legal studies, geography, and scholarship on storytelling to analyze how respondents' values, expressed through stories, work to change or maintain property relations.

    As a resource, agricultural land is endowed with value that changes over time and space. Land tenure regimes consist of shifting social relations regarding this resource, and these relations are often arrived at and maintained through persuasive narratives framed through social value claims about heritage, identity, livelihoods, and community norms. These stories also have a material effect on resource use and property regimes. In Saskatchewan, as survey respondents employ stories to influence policy decisions on agricultural land tenure and advocate for the status quo, they utilize social values that justify their entitlements. Alternative property relations, advocated or proposed by some respondents, provide more fundamental challenges to absolutist notions of private property rights and thus face ideological barriers to acceptance and implementation through policy. However, telling different stories can be a way to alter property relations.

  • Adam Calo, Annie McKee, Coline Perrin, Pierre Gasselin, Steven McGreevy, Sarah Ruth Sippel, Annette Aurélie Desmarais, Kirsteen Shields, Adrien Baysse-Lainé, André Magnan, Naomi Beingessner, and Mai Kobayashi, 2021, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems: Social Movements, Institutions and Government

    Read the full article here.

    Although evidence continues to indicate an urgent need to transition food systems away from industrialized monocultures and toward agroecological production, there is little sign of significant policy commitment toward food system transformation in global North geographies. The authors, a consortium of researchers studying the land-food nexus in global North geographies, argue that a key lock-in explaining the lack of reform arises from how most food system interventions work through dominant logics of property to achieve their goals of agroecological production. Doing so fails to recognize how land tenure systems, codified by law and performed by society, construct agricultural land use outcomes. In this perspective, the authors argue that achieving food system “resilience” requires urgent attention to the underlying property norms that drive land access regimes, especially where norms of property appear hegemonic. This paper first reviews research from political ecology, critical property law, and human geography to show how entrenched property relations in the global North frustrate the advancement of alternative models like food sovereignty and agroecology, and work to mediate acceptable forms of “sustainable agriculture.” Drawing on emerging cases of land tenure reform from the authors' collective experience working in Scotland, France, Australia, Canada, and Japan, we next observe how contesting dominant logics of property creates space to forge deep and equitable food system transformation. Equally, these cases demonstrate how powerful actors in the food system attempt to leverage legal and cultural norms of property to legitimize their control over the resources that drive agricultural production. Our formulation suggests that visions for food system “resilience” must embrace the reform of property relations as much as it does diversified farming practices. This work calls for a joint cultural and legal reimagination of our relation to land in places where property functions as an epistemic and apex entitlement.

  • Annette Aurélie Desmarais, Darrin Qualman, André Magnan, and Nettie Wiebe, 2017, Agriculture and Human Values

    Read the full article here.

    Lea el artículo en español aquí.

    There is growing recognition that land grabbing is a global phenomenon. In Canada, investors are particularly interested in Saskatchewan farmland, the province where 40 % of country’s agricultural land is situated. This article examines how the changing political, economic, and legal context under neoliberalism has shaped patterns of farmland ownership in Saskatchewan, between 2002 and 2014. Our research indicates that over this time, the amount of farmland owned by investors increased 16-fold. Also, the concentration of farmland ownership is on the rise, with the share of farmland owned by the largest four private owners increasing six-fold. Our methodology addresses some of the criticisms raised in the land grabbing literature. By using land titles data, we identified farmland investors and determined very precisely their landholdings thus allowing us to provide a fine-grained analysis of the actual patterns of farmland ownership. Although the article analyzes changes to farmland ownership in a specific historical, cultural and legislative context, it serves as the basis for a broader discussion of the values and priorities that land ownership policies reflect. Namely, we contrast an ‘open for business’ approach that prioritizes financial investment to one based on a land sovereignty approach that prioritizes social investment. The latter has greater potential if the aim is ecological sustainability and food sovereignty.

  • Annette Aurélie Desmarais, Darrin Qualman, André Magnan & Nettie Wiebe, 2015, Canadian Food Studies.

    Read the full article here.

    Since the 2007-2008 global food crisis there is growing interest in changing patterns of farmland ownership. Utilizing a dataset of the names of all farmland titleholders along with GIS data mapping software, this article demonstrates changes in patterns of land ownership in three rural municipalities (RMs) in Saskatchewan, Canada. A diverse mix of new actors have entered the farmland market in the past decade or two, with some now owning more than 100,000 acres each in the province. Our research reveals a list of the investment companies, pension plans, and large farmer/investor hybrids buying land and also maps investment activity and large land transactions in the three RMs. While 7.8% to 13.1% of the farmland is now owned by “land grabbers”, our study also found a significant rise in land concentration in the hands of farmers when compared to 20 years ago. For example, in one RM the four largest landowners—a mix of farmers and investment companies and farmer/investor hybrids—now own 28% of the land. We then discuss some initial findings concerning the impact changing patterns of land ownership is having on the cohesion and vitality of communities and conclude with a series of questions for further research.

More peer-reviewed work

  • Katherine Aske, 2022, The Parkland Institute.

    Read the full report here.

    Alberta has over 50 million acres of farmland. What happens on this land? Who owns it? Who can access it? Most of all, why are land relations structured the way they are? And what are the current impacts of these land tenure dynamics and their implications for our future?

    The answers to these questions are political, and we urgently need to face them together. This report draws on publicly-funded qualitative research conducted from 2019 to 2020. It seeks to contribute to a vibrant path forward for rural Alberta.

    The report draws from interviews with 52 participants — primarily grain and oilseed farmers, but also others such as Agricultural Fieldmen, scholars, and land brokers. It begins by recounting the significant restructuring of the Canadian agricultural sector that has taken place since the neoliberal turn in the 1980s, followed by an analysis of the core research findings showing how and why grain and oilseed farmland tenure is changing, and concludes by making a case for how we ought to make sense of these changes.

  • Naomi Beingessner, 2019, in Frontline Farmers: How the National Farmers Union Resists Agribusiness and Creates Our New Food Future, edited by Annette Aurélie Desmarais

    Order the book here.

    This peer-reviewed book chapter contains interviews with eleven NFU members from Prince Edward Island telling stories of ongoing struggles related to land ownership on the Island. It provides a brief history of landholding in PEI, from absentee landlords controlling the island in 1767 to current corporate challenges to the Lands Protection Act. The Act sets amount limits on land ownership and controls non- resident land ownership to help ensure farmland for Islanders. The NFU members talk about current issues with the Lands Protection Act: the spirit of the Act is not being adhered to as large farmers and corporations find loopholes to buy up land which creates difficulties for smaller and new farmers needing land. They tell stories of past resistance such as the 1971 Tractor Demonstration that shut down transportation to the Island, and project possible futures of farmland in PEI. The interviewees poignantly convey the meanings of land as more than just a commodity and the importance of the NFU as a loud voice for protection of the land.

  • Darrin Qualman, Annette Aurélie Desmarais, André Magnan & Mengistu Wendimu, 2020, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives

    Read the full report here.

    On the Canadian prairies, small and medium-sized family farms are often portrayed as the primary food production units. Yet, the reality of farming in Western Canada is quite different. In fact, a small and declining number of farms are operating the lion’s share of Prairie farmland and capturing the lion’s share of farm revenue and net income.

    Concentration Matters: Farmland Inequality on the Prairies by Darrin Qualman, Annette Aurélie Desmarais, André Magnan and Mengistu Wendimu demonstrates that the ownership and control of Canada’s food-producing land is becoming more and more concentrated, with profound impacts for young farmers, food system security, climate change and democracy.

    The authors analyse the extent of farmland concentration in Canada’s three Prairie provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba), where over 70 per cent of the country’s agricultural land is situated. They find that 38 per cent of Saskatchewan’s farmland is operated and controlled by just 8 per cent of farms. In Alberta, 6 per cent of farms operate 40 per cent of that province’s farmland, while Manitoba sees 4 percent of farms operate and control 24 per cent of the land. Such concentration makes it much harder for young and new farmers to enter agriculture, with the number of young farmers in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba declining by more than 70 per cent within just one generation.

    The persistent decline in the number of farmers, farm size expansion, growing farm income inequality, and increased land concentration have other effects as well. Rural economies, communities, businesses, and services are also affected as there are fewer farm families to patronize local shops and services, while farmers lose their capacity to democratically influence governments and legislation as their voting numbers fall. Meanwhile, non-farmers lose their connections to farms and rural culture as fewer and fewer urban residents count farmers among their family members or friends. A series of policy measures are urgently needed to counter the market forces that will otherwise drive us toward even more concentrated farmland ownership and drive half of Canadian farm families off the land in the next one to two generations.

Photo credit: Katherine Aske

Other publications

  • Annette Aurélie Desmarais & André Magnan, 2023, The Conversation.

    Read the full article here.

    Real estate is a hot topic in Canada. Most Canadians are acutely aware of how home prices and rents have skyrocketed in the last 15 years or so. In large cities, investor ownership of condos and houses has attracted the attention of policymakers and the public at large, prompting the federal government to crack down on foreign buyers.

    While many are familiar with these urban real estate trends, few are aware of the restructuring of farmland ownership occurring in rural areas. Since 2014, we’ve been studying changing land tenure patterns in the Prairies, where 70 per cent of Canada’s agricultural land is situated.

    Our research reveals three major trends — ongoing farm consolidation, increasing land concentration and expanding investor ownership of farmland — leading to growing land inequality. Like the transformation of urban real estate, who benefits from these changes is highly contested.

  • André Magnan, Annette Aurélie Desmarais, & Mengistu Wendimu, 2022. University of Manitoba & University of Regina.

    Read the full report here.

    In recent years, farmland markets have become more competitive and dynamic. Farmland values have risen rapidly since the mid-2000s as investors and expansion-oriented farmers have become important players in local markets. Rising land prices and increased competition may pose challenges to smaller farmers and new entrants into the sector. This report summarizes the findings of a survey of 400 prairie grain farmers focusing on their experiences in local farmland markets. We find that farmers face a number of challenges in purchasing and renting farmland, including increased competition from investors and large-scale operations. Farmers view trends like investor ownership of farmland and land concentration with concern, citing competition, higher land prices, the decline of rural communities, barriers for younger farmers, and damage to the environment as associated problems.

    As part of this study, we analyze 668 farmland rental contracts to better understand today’s rental market. Seventy-six percent of the farmers in our sample rent land and the most common landlord types are retired farmers, the spouse or relative of a retired or deceased farmer, and non-farmer individual investors. Investment corporations represent 2.2% of landlords across the three provinces, but nearly 4% in Saskatchewan. When comparing landlord types, we find that investment corporations favour longer rental contracts and had, on average, a longer relationship with the tenant farmer. Investment corporations charged higher rental rates than other landlord types, but individual investors charged lower rental rates. While tenants maintain a high degree of autonomy over farming decisions, investment corporations were much more likely than other landlords to require specific farm management practices of their tenants. Our study points to the need to re-examine policies and programs that shape access to land for prairie farmers with an eye to questions of ecological, social, and economic sustainability.

  • Naomi Beingessner, 2021, Blue Jay

    Read the full article here.

  • André Magnan & Annette Aurélie Desmarais, 2017, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives

    Read the full report here.

    The question of who should get the right to own farmland in Saskatchewan has been a controversial one in recent years. The sale of $128 million in farmland holdings to the Canada Pension Plan in 2014 caused enough concern to move the government to prohibit pension plans and large trusts from acquiring farmland in Saskatchewan. In Who’s Buying the Farm: Farmland Investment Patterns in Saskatchewan, 2003-14, authors Andre Magnan and Annette Demarsais set out to provide a more complete picture of farmland investment patterns in Saskatchewan, identifying major private and out-of-province investors and the extent of their holdings in Saskatchewan. The authors find that investor ownership of farmland in Saskatchewan has grown dramatically since ownership restrictions were relaxed in 2003 and are having a measureable impact on the farmland market. In some regions of the province where private investment is particularly robust, the presence of investors may be significantly affecting the availability and price of land, which may be making it more difficult for existing farmers to expand their operations.

  • Laura E. Funk, Katherine Diana Aske & Annette Aurélie Desmarais, 2021, The Parkland Institute

    Read the full article here.

    The Alberta government recently took a step toward privatizing the operation of its land titles, corporate, and personal property registries. Why the government would want to sell a key revenue-generating public asset remains a mystery, unless one acts primarily and/or exclusively on ideological impulses.

  • André Magnan & Annette Aurélie Desmarais, May 14, 2023, Institutional Landscapes Blog

    Read the post here.

Theses

  • Naomi Beingessner, 2022, doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba.

    Read the thesis here.

    Amid trends of privatization, financialization, and decreasing access to agricultural land, there is a call for more sustainable and equitable land tenure and access. In response, I present four cases as interventions into the story of private property in the Canadian prairies, asking how stakeholders negotiate the multiple and sometimes competing functions of agricultural land in economic development, food production, conserving and enhancing ecological resources, recreation, and reconciliation. In qualitative studies of a) persuasive stories used by respondents to government consultations on land ownership to foster change b) public responses to changes in trespassing legislation, c) conflict and collaboration among stakeholders managing land for agri-environmental goals in alternative grazing land tenure models and d) a network of settler landholders sharing land with Indigenous land users, I employ critical realism to analyse interviews and secondary data. I consider questions of rights and responsibilities to land, mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion from land, the public good, and the discourse and actions that challenge or legitimize land access/tenure practices and related policies/legislation. Each case also explores the possibility of different futures for land regimes based on changing social relations as people work to challenge or further entrench private property rights. Alternatives to private land ownership cultivate diverse relationships in relation to, and with, land and people.

  • Melissa Davidson, 2021, University of Manitoba

    Read the full thesis here.

    Across the province of Saskatchewan, where more than 40% of Canada’s agricultural land is located, patterns of farmland tenure are shifting and farmers claim that much is at stake. Based on both qualitative and quantitative research, this thesis analyzes two processes taking place in Saskatchewan: the ongoing consolidation of farmland and increasing financially-motivated farmland ownership. In addition to discussing the ways in which these shifts are transforming agriculture, the environment, and rural societies, this work provides insights into the locally-specific nature of these trends, the frameworks in which they are understood, and the grounds on which they are being accepted and facilitated by farmers. Situated within discussions of land and its meanings, I argue that as farmland is further consolidated and owned in greater proportions by absentee landowners and non-farmers, land is increasingly being oriented towards its productive and financial value, thereby displacing many of its social, cultural, and ecological meanings—what is commonly referred to as deterritorialization. Although treating land this way has allowed some Saskatchewan farmers to continue farming, farmland consolidation and increasing investor land ownership are pursued at the expense of the livelihoods of many farmers, the erosion of rural communities, and ecological degradation.

  • Hannah Bihun, 2021, University of Manitoba

    Read the full thesis here.

    On the Canadian prairies, farmland is more than just an investment or a resource; access and control over farmland is deeply embedded in the history, culture, and identity of Canadian farmers. Land grabbing, the large-scale purchase of farmland by domestic or foreign investors, is a phenomenon on the rise worldwide and is best understood within the framework of financialization. Despite a lack of quantitative research on the topic, some of the effects of financialization in the agri-food sector are visible in Manitoba, including rising farmland prices and increasing farmland concentration, resulting in fewer and larger farms. My research investigates the dynamics of farmland ownership in four rural municipalities with high valued farmland in Manitoba. Although reliable information about farmland investment in Manitoba is limited, 39 semi-structured interviews with farmers, rural municipal officials and staff, and others involved in the agriculture industry, provide a baseline understanding of the current dimensions of farmland sales, farmer-landlord relationships, and the social and environmental implications of increasing farmland concentration. I draw on participants’ perceptions of investors to better understand how these kinds of purchases might impact rural landscapes. Furthermore, I find that farmers themselves have adopted financial logics as they make land purchases that are less rooted in the productive value of the land and increasingly motivated by the speculative value of the land. Thus, my research reveals the ways that the ‘good farmer’ framework is at work in Manitoba and is pushing farmers to make “non-economically rational” (as cited in Burton et al., 2020, p.2) decisions that are ultimately contributing to the deterioration of rural communities and environments. The thesis concludes by discussing two pathways for the future of agriculture in Manitoba: the first is that these trends will deepen and access to land and control over food production will be further extracted from the hands of local people. The second is a more hopeful possibility that farmers, civil society, and government might co-construct a different future in agriculture by redefining what it means to be a ‘good farmer’ and prioritizing community, collaboration, and profitable/viable farm businesses.

  • Katherine Diana Aske, 2020, University of Manitoba

    Read the full thesis here.

    Across the Prairie Provinces, concern is growing as investor actors of various stripes continue to show interest in purchasing farmland, in addition to the broader trends of increased rates of tenant farming, and farmland concentration. These tenure changes are not being closely monitored at the provincial level. Due to the inaccessibility of the land titles data in Alberta, it is not yet possible to do a quantitative analysis of tenure changes, as has been done in Saskatchewan. This study instead hones in at the community level in three regions of Alberta through 40 interviews, primarily with grain and oilseed farmers. The interviews reveal that financial players -- investor actors, as well as banks -- are pushing up the price of farmland, creating a widening gap between its market value and productive value. I argue that irrespective of the landlord, tenant farming arrangements will not allow the kinds of transformations to alternatives that are necessary in the face of the farm income crisis as well as the climate crisis. I also analyze the unravelling of rural community structures under neoliberalism, and consider how these changes impede the collective action needed to push for transformation.

  • Laura E. Funk, 2020, University of Manitoba

    Read the full thesis here.

    In Canada, land registries fall within provincial governments’ jurisdiction and therefore, approaches to management vary across the country. A trend of privatization has occurred in some provinces, marking changes in how governments approach the management of their land registries. Research on land administration and management of public services has not included thorough examination of the levels of accessibility of land registry data to the public. While there are some members of the general public who can efficiently access data, others face challenges when seeking to acquire data for various public interest purposes. This multiple case study analysis centres on the Canadian prairies where provincial governments’ decisions regarding land registries are developing within a context of modernizing public services. Through semi-structured interviews with 21 individuals and document analysis of various resources including Hansard records, I seek to explore the political economy of land registry management and the inclusion of the private sector in modernization and service delivery. I highlight the streamlining of services according to lawyer-centric systems and products, which have developed based on an orientation towards creating, improving and marketing services towards professionals in legal, real estate and financial sectors. I connect this trend to the evolving commercialization and marketization of land registries occurring in cases where private sector service providers (in partnership with provincial governments) are leveraging data to generate capital for shareholders and owners. In doing so, the “public” nature of land registry data is challenged and compromised. Based on these developments, I usefully discuss the implications of lawyer-centric systems on the accessibility of data to members of the public who do not fit within the mainstream category of clientele, but maintain a right and hold valid interests in accessing public land registry data.

Photo credit: Katherine Aske